Unless there's some reason to think otherwise, I'm resolving a suggested deletion (implicitly a vote for deletion from the nominator) with no objection as 'delete'. I will probably be working on clearing the backlog, back to front (because I'm of linear mind). Well, I hope I haven't queered anything but I've been bold and resolved several old redirects. Thanks, Kjkolb 15:08, 12 December 2005 (UTC) Reply I guess I could write a stub in place of the redirect. I don't know if these are valid reasons to delete a redirect according to this page, though. Also, it has no history of other than being a redirect. The problem is illustrated by the radiometric dating article, which has a link to uranium-lead dating that leads right back to itself. Uranium lead just redirects to the radiometric dating article. Every other method of radiometric dating has an article or is a red link. If people don't realize that it's missing, we will never have an article on it.
![load saved files in cdpedia load saved files in cdpedia](https://help.relativity.com/9.5/Content/Resources/Images/Features/Single_File_Upload/SCR_ProcErrorSecurity.png)
I don't know about other people, but most of the articles I write are found through red links.
![load saved files in cdpedia load saved files in cdpedia](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/photo-upload-utility2-1213973516923014-9/95/photo-upload-utility2-7-728.jpg)
I nominated uranium-lead dating for deletion because it makes it look like we have an article on it, but we don't. Demi T/ C 07:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC) Reply Hello. I hope this explanation of what I've been up to helps. I've been archiving the RFD discussions on the talk page of the redirect. In the case of "Uranium-lead dating" the nominator didn't really specify a valid reason ("making links red so people create an article" isn't really a reason to delete, at least according to this page) and so I did the same for it. One thing I have been taking into consideration is the history-if a redirect has content in its history it probably shouldn't be deleted. Basically I think out-of-process entries should get a "no consensus"-without the rfd tag in the right place, for the proper period of time, a consensus isn't really possible. Jitse Niesen ( talk) 01:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC) Reply I hope you don't mind but my boldness got the better of me and I resolved these discussions as well. If an admin with experience of taking care of RfD (or anybody, really) could please comment on the four remaining entries, under 21 November, 23 November, and 25 November, I'd soon get the hang of it. jni 15:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC) Reply I processed eight listings in the period 21–25 Nov, choosing to ignore the line "If a request is already somewhat older than a week, it has almost certainly been left for a reason (usually to try and spur further debate, or to try and reach rough consensus), so be cautious about deleting such entries." I flagged anything I was unsure of. Many entries here are really trivial cases like "foo" → foo that we obviously don't need to keep (unless valid objections can be found, of course, but for that purpose we have the lag time).
![load saved files in cdpedia load saved files in cdpedia](https://www.altova.com/manual/MobileTogether/mobiletogetherdesigner/images/mtdimagefileloadsaveclient.png)
older≠ wiser 00:36, 4 December 2005 (UTC) Reply Second that. Woohookitty (cat scratches) 09:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC) Reply Actually, I'd think that if no objections are raised after two weeks, then they should be deleted rather than assume no consensus. Everything that has no vote and has been here for 2+ weeks will be closed as no consensus.
![load saved files in cdpedia load saved files in cdpedia](https://howchoo.com/media/nd/gx/zw/saving-games-in-retropie.jpeg)
With oodles of content and a surprisingly engaging battle system, you might find yourself spending a decent chunk of time playing the magical lord in this little app that packs a.We have a massive backlog here. To be honest, if you’re looking for a tile-based grand strategy game that fits in your pocket you can’t do much better than Planar Conquest.
#Load saved files in cdpedia plus
Please read and follow our cheat-descriptions to correctly use our trainer! Petit Let's play du jeux Planar Conquest ou je me prend pour le plus puissant des sorciers:D. For this reason cheats of the Planar Conquest trainer can only be activated after the game already used these functions at least one time.
#Load saved files in cdpedia full
Planar Conquest is a full dynamical game which creates game functions at runtime if needed. Find cities, raise armies, cast spells, and create powerful magical artifacts in your bid to become the Supreme Sorcerer Lord in Worlds of Magic: Planar Conquest, a 4X turn-based strategy game. BECOME THE SUPREME SORCERER! Explore and conquer an almost limitless number of uniquely generated universes using military and magical power to overcome your foes.